Thursday, January 8, 2026 Trending: #ArtificialIntelligence
AI Term of the Day: Agentic AI

AI Model Comparison

Compare AI models side-by-side: pricing, speed, capabilities, and more

Claude 3 Haiku

Anthropic
Input Cost$0.2500
Output Cost$1.25
Context200K
SpeedVery Fast
Capabilities:
TextCodeVision
Best for:
Quick responsesCost-effectiveSimple tasks

Claude 3 Opus

Anthropic
Input Cost$15.00
Output Cost$75.00
Context200K
SpeedSlow
Capabilities:
TextCodeVisionFunction CallingLong context
Best for:
Complex reasoningResearchHigh-quality writing

Claude 3 Sonnet

Anthropic
Input Cost$3.00
Output Cost$15.00
Context200K
SpeedMedium
Capabilities:
TextCodeVisionFunction Calling
Best for:
Balanced performanceGeneral tasksCode assistance

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic
Input Cost$3.00
Output Cost$15.00
Context200K
SpeedFast
Capabilities:
TextCodeVisionFunction CallingLong context
Best for:
Code generationLong documentsAnalysisWriting

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Google
Input Cost$0.5000
Output Cost$1.50
Context33K
SpeedFast
Capabilities:
TextCode
Best for:
General tasksText generationSimple applications

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Google
Input Cost$0.0750
Output Cost$0.3000
Context1.0M
SpeedVery Fast
Capabilities:
TextCodeVisionAudioLong context
Best for:
High-volumeCost-effectiveFast responsesLong documents

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Google
Input Cost$1.25
Output Cost$5.00
Context1.0M
SpeedMedium
Capabilities:
TextCodeVisionAudioVideoLong context
Best for:
Long contextMultimodal tasksResearchAnalysis

GPT-3.5 Turbo

OpenAI
Input Cost$0.5000
Output Cost$1.50
Context16K
SpeedVery Fast
Capabilities:
TextCodeFunction Calling
Best for:
Simple tasksChat applicationsBudget-friendly projects

GPT-4 Turbo

OpenAI
Input Cost$10.00
Output Cost$30.00
Context128K
SpeedMedium
Capabilities:
TextVisionCodeFunction Calling
Best for:
Complex analysisLong documentsCreative writing

GPT-4o

OpenAI
Input Cost$2.50
Output Cost$10.00
Context128K
SpeedFast
Capabilities:
TextVisionCodeFunction CallingJSON Mode
Best for:
Complex reasoningCode generationMultimodal tasksAPI integration

GPT-4o Mini

OpenAI
Input Cost$0.1500
Output Cost$0.6000
Context128K
SpeedVery Fast
Capabilities:
TextCodeFunction CallingJSON Mode
Best for:
High-volume tasksCost-effective applicationsSimple reasoning

Llama 3.1 70B

Groq
Input Cost$0.5900
Output Cost$0.7900
Context131K
SpeedVery Fast
Capabilities:
TextCodeOpen source
Best for:
High-speed inferenceCost-effectiveOpen source projects

Llama 3.1 8B

Groq
Input Cost$0.0500
Output Cost$0.0800
Context131K
SpeedVery Fast
Capabilities:
TextCodeOpen source
Best for:
Ultra-fast responsesBudget applicationsSimple tasks

Mistral Large

Mistral AI
Input Cost$2.00
Output Cost$6.00
Context128K
SpeedFast
Capabilities:
TextCodeFunction Calling
Best for:
European complianceMultilingualCode generation

Mistral Medium

Mistral AI
Input Cost$2.70
Output Cost$8.10
Context32K
SpeedMedium
Capabilities:
TextCode
Best for:
Balanced performanceGeneral tasks

Side-by-Side Comparison (3 models)

ModelProviderInput Cost (1K tokens)Output Cost (1K tokens)Context WindowSpeedCapabilitiesBest For
GPT-4oOpenAI$2.50$10.00128KFast
Text, Vision, Code, Function Calling, JSON Mode
Complex reasoning, Code generation, Multimodal tasks, API integration
Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic$3.00$15.00200KFast
Text, Code, Vision, Function Calling, Long context
Code generation, Long documents, Analysis, Writing
Gemini 1.5 ProGoogle$1.25$5.001.0MMedium
Text, Code, Vision, Audio, Video, Long context
Long context, Multimodal tasks, Research, Analysis

Select up to 5 models to compare side-by-side. Click on model cards to add or remove them from comparison.

Which AI Model Should You Choose?

Choosing the right AI model depends on your specific needs. Consider factors like cost, speed, context window size, and capabilities. GPT-4o offers excellent balance for most tasks, Claude 3.5 Sonnet excels at code generation and long documents, while Gemini 1.5 Flash provides the best cost-to-performance ratio for high-volume applications.

Developers building applications need models with fast response times and reliable APIs. Content creators may prioritize quality and writing capabilities. Businesses processing large volumes of text need cost-effective solutions. This comparison tool helps you evaluate all these factors side-by-side.

ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude

ChatGPT (GPT-4o): Best for general-purpose tasks, API integration, and multimodal applications. Offers fast responses and good code generation capabilities. Ideal for developers building AI-powered features into their applications.

Gemini: Excellent for long-context tasks (up to 1M tokens), multimodal applications, and cost-effective high-volume use cases. Gemini 1.5 Flash is particularly fast and affordable, making it perfect for applications requiring high throughput.

Claude: Superior for code generation, long document analysis, and high-quality writing. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is considered one of the best coding assistants available, with exceptional reasoning capabilities for complex tasks.

Understanding AI Model Features

Context Window: The maximum number of tokens a model can process in a single request. Larger context windows allow processing of longer documents without truncation. This is crucial for document analysis, code review, and research tasks.

Speed: Response time varies significantly between models. Very fast models like Llama 3.1 are ideal for real-time applications, while slower models like Claude 3 Opus provide higher quality outputs. Consider your use case's latency requirements.

Capabilities: Different models support different features. Some support vision, audio, or video processing, while others focus on text and code generation. Multimodal capabilities expand use cases but may increase costs.